Sunday 29 June 2014

Survey of American Literature Final Essay


This is my essay for Survey of American Literature final task. It's an analysis about 2 poems by Langston Hughes, "I, Too" and "Theme for English B". I know this writing lacks in many ways for my vocabulary is very limited and I'm sometimes lost in tenses, but at least I tried. So, this is my writing. Happy reading. 

Pursuing Equality through Being One True Self

                Langston Hughes’ “I, Too” and “Theme for English B” are two poems published on 1940s (I, Too was published on 1945 and Theme for English B was published on 1949) when the civil rights movement was happening in America. Civil rights movement is a social movement against racial segregation and discrimination towards African Americans.[1] The African Americans struggled to gain the equality in American society. Many African Americans were discriminated from society for their colored skin, they were treated unequally in education, economic, and even before law. They were not able to even give their votes whereas giving a vote means you’re contributing to your country’s development. There was a rule on 1945, stating that only white men could vote in the Democratic primary.[2] For the segregation and discrimination were getting more serious and unbearable, some people started to voice their protest and make a movement. Hughes is one of many African Americans who contributed to civil rights movement. He wrote several books, plays, short stories, essays, and poems as forms of his critics against racism issue.[3] These two poems I’m going to analyze in this essay also contained racism issue where African Americans were seen as the inferior to the whites. They were treated differently in society. In “I, Too”, the writer was sent to the kitchen when the owner of the house had visitors. It shows the different class between the white and the African American. At that time, people only ate at dining table, those who ate in the kitchen were considered lower. This means that the whites didn’t consider the African Americans as equal with them. Meanwhile, in “Theme for English B”, the narrator is a student who was assigned to write a page for English B by his white teacher. It was said that he was the only African American in the class he attended. He wrote a “confession” about how it felt to be the only colored student in class, how he wanted them to see him as a “normal” person, a part of them. However, both narrators of the poems conveyed the same message. They wanted the whites to see them as a part of the society (by society I mean the whites). They didn’t see themselves as the inferiors. They looked on themselves as equal to the white and I found the narrative of the poems quite interesting. Therefore I decided to bring up this topic as the main topic of my essay, that the narrators tried to gain the equality through showing their true selves to the society
Before I started my explanation on the main topic, I’d like to point out the racism matter first. As you know that America had claimed their independence from Britain since the 4th of July 1776. They claimed to be free and started the Democracy. However, was the independence really given to all American citizens including the slaves? Douglass stated in his writing, “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July” that the Fourth of July was just a deceptive cover of what the nation have done to the slaves for so long.

“To him, your celebration is a sham; your boasted liberty, an unholy license; your national greatness, swelling vanity; your sounds of rejoicing are empty and heartless; your denunciations of tyrants, brass fronted impudence; your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery; your prayers and hymns, your sermons and thanksgivings, with all your religious parade, and solemnity, are to him, mere bombast, fraud, deception, impiety, and hypocrisy—a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages.”

The quotation above is an evidence of how the “Independence” in the fourth of July was just given to the whites. The fourth of July was never meant for the slaves because the injustice was still going on for the next 400 years until the abolition was finally granted on 1863 after Lincoln declared the Emancipation Proclamation.[4] Did it end there, then? Ironically, it didn’t. The discrimination and slavery were still there for the African Americans, even after 100 years of Emancipation Proclamation. The struggle to pursue the equality they have dreamed about for so long was never enough and it seemed like no matter what actions they took at that time, they couldn’t change the way American society see them. The equality for the African Americans was nowhere to be found.
However, they never stopped struggling. Some African Americans like Hughes chose writing as a way to voice their demand of equality. Hughes’ narrative in “I, Too” and “Theme for English B” shows us his determination in pursuing equality.

            Tomorrow,
            I’ll be at the table
            When company comes.
            Nobody’ll dare
            Say to me,
            “Eat in the kitchen,"”

            The narrator showed us that he too, even though he was an African American, had rights to mingle with the visitors. He too deserved to eat together with them at the table. He showed us his determination to be equal with other people through those lines above. His future will to eat together at the table with the whites was his vision of equality between the whites and African Americans. He wanted the society to see him as a part of them because despite him being colored, he was truly a part of them. Besides, we are the only ones who have the authority to decide everything on our life. Being colored doesn’t mean you have less authority to control your own body or will, that’s what he wanted to convey through this poem, and that’s what the whites needed to understand to stop the slavery at that time. Unawareness of such fact was the main reason of the continuity of slavery in American society. We are all human, human are all equal before God.
            Guignon in his book, “On Being Authentic” explains how important it is to be your true self and trust your own feeling in making every decisions in life and led yourself to the right path.

It is to see that what my life amounts to is something I decide, and that I take over this decision fully only if I resist the siren call of tradition and convention. The only thing that is necessary to my being master of my own life, given this vision of things, is freedom from the illusions, pressures and constraints that push me toward one path rather than another.” (page 34)

            Guignon wanted to remind us that we  all are the masters of our selves and that means we have the authority to  decide what we wanted to be and do according to our own free will (with the consideration of how the decision will affect others, of course, because it is a part of your responsibility towards others as a human being[5]). No one should tell us what to do, just like in “I, Too”. The narrator wanted to point out that the white had no right to cast him out when the visitors came.
            His determination to be equal through his determined narrative in his poem was actually his way to show the whites that he had power over himself. He had the authority over his own being and he was free to be where he wanted to be or what he wanted to be.

Besides,
They’ll see how beautiful I am
And be ashamed—
I, too, am America.”

            The last four lines emphasize that he is also a part of America and someday he would show the world that he is capable of doing something they thought he isn’t. The perception which see the African Americans as the inferior and the ones who were not capable of doing anything but being slaves was actually understandable considering the history of slavery in which we know that the African Americans were always in the lower caste in society. However, the narrator dared to say that he would change the way the society look at him someday. He would show them his true self so nobody would ever look down on him anymore in the future.
            Meanwhile in “Theme for English B”, the narrator was trying to show his pride as an African American. He proudly stated that he was the only colored student in his class. Despite being colored, he seemed to be more intellegent (probably because he got education). The writer also mentioned several things to show that his daily activities were just like the white’s daily activities.

            “Well, I like to eat, sleep, drink, and be in love.
            I like to work, read, learn, and understand life.
I like a pipe for a Christmas present,
or records---Bessie, bop, or Bach.
I guess being colored doesn't make me NOT like
the same things other folks like who are other races.”

            He mentioned his daily activities through these lines, showing that he did things the way the whites did. However it felt like the narrator was trying to show the readers that despite being colored, he did things the way the whites did, bringing up their equality in daily life. He equally liked to listen to good music like the whites, and he also celebrated Christmas like common Americans. So why did people treat him differently? It seemed like he wanted to point out that the difference between him and the whites are just the color of his skin. How did the color of one’s skin define his caste in society? The narrator even used capital letters for the word “not” to emphasize his point.
            What’s more interesting here is his intention to mention his “color” in the poem. He implicitly showed us that he was proud of being African American.

“So will my page be colored that I write?
Being me, it will not be white.
But it will be
a part of you, instructor.”

            He didn’t bother to make his writing look “white”, he even repeatedly say that he was ‘colored’. He was proud of himself being African American and he wanted his teacher to know that. His writing was like a reminder that even though he was colored, he was still a part of the white and vice versa.
            Guignon quoted Starobinski’s words on his book. It is related to expressing yourself to the world as a way to maintain your true identity, your true self, for doing so means you are proud of being you.

To be yourself, on this view, is to own up to the task of self-making in a way that is truthful to your own genuine feelings at each moment” (Starobinski)

            As I have mentioned above, the narrator didn’t even bother to make his writing look ‘white’, he wanted his true color to be seen as clear as possible. He wanted to show his reader that he didn’t need to be ‘white’ to be a part of them because he was already a part of them for they lived in the same land and pursued the same dream. For that reason, they were all equal.
            In conclusion, I’d like to point out that sometimes it is hard to be the minority in one’s society. However, that’s what makes us different and special. The narrators showed us their struggle to survive in certain society as minority. They pursued the equality through their own ways to show the majority that they were also a part of them. They didn’t pretend to be one of them. They were who they are and they were proud of themselves. I’d like to quote Polonius words in my conclusion here.

“This above all: to thine own self be true, and it doth follow, as the night the day, / Thou canst not then be false to any man.” (Polonius on On Being Authentic, p.25)
           
            I can conclude then, that you have to be true to yourself so you can be true to others. You have to know who you are first or else you can’t expect others to see your true color and accept you for who you really are.

Work Cited:

Guignon, Charles. 2004. “On Being Authentic”. London: Routledge.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. 1948. “Existentialism and Humanism”. London: Mathuen & Co.
Douglass, Frederick. 1852. “What to the Slave Is the Fourth of July?”. Retrieved June 14 2014 from
Hughes, Langston. 1945. “I, Too”. Retrieved June 14 2014 from
Hughes, Langston. 1949. “Theme for English B”. Retrieved June 14 2014 from
“African-American Civil Rights Movements (1954-1968)”. Wikipedia. Retrieved June 14 2014 from
“Civil Rights Movement”. New Georgia Ensyclopedia. Retrieved June 14 2014 from
“Emancipation Proclamation”. The History Chanel. Retrieved June 14 2014 from www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation






[1] African-American Civil Rights Movements (1954-1968), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/African-American_Civil_Rights_Movement
[2] Civil Rights Movement, http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/articles/history-archaeology/civil-rights-movement
[3] Hughes’ Life and Career, http://www.english.illinois.edu/maps/poets/g_l/hughes/life.htm
[4] Emancipation Proclamation is a declaration by Lincoln to free the slaves. The main reason behind the proclamation was actually to end the war and to re-unite the Confederate States and the Union States. (The History Chanel, Emancipation Proclamation, www.history.com/topics/emancipation-proclamation)
[5] The existentialists say at once that man is anguish, which means he cannot escape the feeling of his total responsibility towards people in making a decision (Jean-Paul Sartre, Existentialism, p.443)

No comments:

Post a Comment