Friday, 25 July 2014

Response 1: Culler's Presupposition and Intertextuality


There are times when you read a book, you feel like you have read the book before. There are also times when you read a book, you find some words or terms you are not familiar with. What do you do? Have you ever tried reading another book with more detailed explanation about such terms? If you haven’t, then you should. Basically, this is what intertextuality is. When you are reading certain book, your mind will direct you to certain texts you have read before, that’s why you might feel like you have read certain sentences in the text you’re currently reading or you are quite familiar with the topic. As for the need for a more detailed explanation of certain terms in a book, reading another book might help you understand the terms better. In fact, a text has infinite intertextuality, meaning that the text can be related to any other texts. However, it is not possible to find the origin of certain text. There is no such thing as originality in intertextuality because as Culler have stated, “The study of intertextuality is not the investigation of sources and influences.”. It rather allows us to decide which texts we should read next